Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luke Saville vs Rik De Voest Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Saville vs Voest analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Saville vs Rik De Voest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Saville 0 - 0 Voest
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Saville has won 49.93% of points on their second serve, while Voest has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Saville, in recent form, has won 51.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Voest has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Saville has saved 62.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voest has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Saville has won 58.46% of matches played (W/L 38/ 27), with Voest winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Saville has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 70/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22). Voest has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Saville has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.87% of matches (W/L 26/ 5), where as Voest has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Saville has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.75 while Voest has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Saville has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voest has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Saville has converted 44.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voest has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
44
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Luke Saville vs Rik De Voest For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Saville VS Voest
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luke Saville | Rik De Voest |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (17/15) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (36/37) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (349/331) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 117 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 99 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:2 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 208.84 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1395/2132) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (984/1395) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (368/737) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (78/176) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (799/2114) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 73% (11/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 1st Match |
Luke Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luke Saville
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Luke Saville
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
13
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Giles Hussey
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Luke Saville
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Luke Saville
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Luke Saville
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Luke Saville
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Luke Saville
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Yanki Erel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Saville Vs Voest Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Saville are available here and Voest photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
